Tag-Archive for ◊ stimulus ◊

Author: John Travis
• Monday, February 02nd, 2009

The U.S. personal saving rate jumped to 3.6% in December (from 2.8% in November) as consumers try to offset steep losses in household wealth. The saving rate remained low into the first half of the year (dropping as low as zero in April), when gasoline prices were approaching record highs, and then jumped temporarily in the summer once government stimulus checks started hitting taxpayers’ bank accounts.

spendingHow high will it go? A lot depends on how much worse stocks, housing values and labor markets fare in the coming months. Tumbling retirement accounts and other savings in the stock market would be enough to spur Americans to put away cash. But plenty of other forces are at work. With job losses mounting, people who still have their jobs may choose to save up in case they hit trouble down the road. And home prices, now down 25% from their mid-2006 peak, have shown few signs of finding their bottom.

Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Capital, says the drop in saving will weigh on consumer spending over the next couple of years simply due to wealth declines that have already taken place. Because changes in the saving rate lag behind declines in wealth, the effects on savings may just be starting to take hold. (After all, stocks and home prices have been falling for well over a year.) “How long this lasts and how high the savings rate goes depends on how much these assets have to fall,” Mr. Maki says. He sees the saving rate drifting into the 4% to 5% range through 2010. But a lot depends on the performance of stocks, which presumably would recover if the government takes strong action and pulls the economy out of its downturn.

Apart from temporary spikes (such as government stimulus), the saving rate — defined as disposable income minus spending — hasn’t been as high as December’s level since 1999 — when it was coming off much higher historical levels. Saving was above 10% for much of the 1980s, then between 5% and 9% until the mid-1990s when stocks and home values started rising. One factor in the latest spike may be that consumers are delaying purchases of big-ticket items, such as cars and appliances, even though they still plan to make those purchases. But that’s only part of the problem.

Goldman Sachs economists put the long-term equilibrium for the saving rate at between 6% and 10%. Their baseline forecast assumes something closer to 10%, but they acknowledge it could be even higher. If the saving rate remains in that territory, it could be a positive for the economy in the long run. But the sudden shift, with consumer spending is already taking heavy blows, shows why the economy is tumbling these days — and why getting out of this mess will be difficult. –Sudeep Reddy

Author: John Travis
• Monday, January 19th, 2009

A roundup of economic news from around the Web.

  • Bank of America’s Deal: Writing on his Basline Scenario blog, Simon Johnson looks at the government’s deal to aid Bank of America and remains critical of the government’s approach. “This is more of the same incoherent Policy By Deal that has failed to stabilize the financial system, while also greatly annoying pretty much everyone on Capitol Hill. Hopefully, it is the last gasp of the Paulson strategy and the Obama team will shortly unveil a more systematic approach to bank recapitalization; it would be a major mistake to continue in the Citi II/BoA II vein.” Separately, the Journal’s David Wessel discusses how well TARP is working on NPR.
  • Tax Cuts and Stimulus: Writing for the Financial Times, Joseph Stiglitz says tax cuts shouldn’t be part of the stimulus. “We are in uncharted territory in this crisis. But household tax cuts, except for possibly the poorest, should have no place in the stimulus. Nor should business tax breaks, except when closely linked with additional investment. The one tax cut that should be included is a temporary incremental investment tax credit; it provides a big bang for the buck, encouraging companies to invest now when the economy needs the spending. Increased investments in infrastructure, education and technology, relief to states, and help to the unemployed need pride of place.”
  • Compiled by Phil Izzo

    Author: John Travis
    • Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

    A roundup of economic news from around the Web.

  • More Than Stimulus: Martin Wolf of the Financial Times writes that stimulus alone won’t save the U.S. economy. “First, there must be a credible program for what Americans call “deleveraging”. The U.S. cannot afford years of painful debt reduction in the private sector — a process that has still barely begun. The alternative is forced write-downs of bad assets in the financial sector and either more fiscal recapitalization or debt-for-equity swaps. It also means the mass bankruptcy of insolvent households and forced write-downs of mortgages. All this would also lead to big one-off increases in public debt. But those increases would probably be much smaller than those generated by a decade of huge fiscal deficits. The aim is to have a slimmer and better-capitalized financial system and a healthier non-financial private-sector balance sheet, sooner rather than later. The troubled asset relief program should be used for these purposes. It will need to be bigger. Second and most important, the structural current account deficit has to diminish. The US private sector is no longer in a position to run huge financial deficits as an offset to the demand-draining external deficits. The public sector can do so only for a few years. In the long run, the world economy must be sustainably and healthily rebalanced. This is a huge challenge for international economic diplomacy. It is also an essential element of sound domestic policy.”
  • Fed Balance Sheet: Writing on the Econbrowser blog, James Hamilton looks a Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s speech yesterday and wonders about the risks the central bank is taking on. “That sounds to me like an exit strategy for how to get out of this if everything works out just right and the problems all go away. And what’s the exit strategy if it doesn’t work? I suppose more lending facilities.” Separately, on the Atlanta Fed’s macroblog, David Altig plays down the inflationary implications of the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet.
  • Compiled by Phil Izzo